Compliance stems from a shared architecture

Compliance within the DORG ecosystem is not centralized in a single entity. It is distributed according to a shared responsibility model. Each entity is responsible for what it effectively controls, with obligations formalized in the Master Agreement.

[Shared Responsibility Model]

DORG SRL

Responsible for technical quality and software security.

DORG SRL never accesses the client’s environment. Its responsibility is limited to the software.

[ Shared Responsibility Model ]

DORG Society ETS

Responsible for ethical governance and compliance with the Code of Conduct.

DORG Society does not access operational data. It governs through rules and monitors through patterns and pseudonymized data

[ Shared Responsibility Model ]

User Organization

Responsible for operational and regulatory compliance within its own context.

Adherence to the Code of Conduct is mandatory. It is not sufficient to replace legal obligations and compliance with internal procedures

[ Mission ]

The conditional verification system

DORGs operate only when three conditions are verified daily: software updates within security deadlines, transmission of ethical supervision data, and payment of the governance fee for the mitigation of social and environmental impacts

Failure to comply activates a grace period; failure to restore compliance within the terms results in automatic deactivation.

Verification is technical and cannot be bypassed — any attempt at circumvention constitutes grounds for immediate contract termination.